When you own a Lancer Evolution IX, you know that you have a car that can perform and stick to the road no matter how fast you’re going. But if you’re looking to take your Evo IX’s performance to the next level, it may be time to upgrade your intake system. The AMS and K&N short ram intakes are two popular options on the market, but which one is better? In this article, we’ll dive into a shootout between the two and share dyno-tested results so you can make an informed decision.
Lancer Evolution IX: AMS vs. K&N
Before we jump into the shootout, let’s quickly cover the basics of each intake. The AMS short ram intake features a polished aluminum tubing and a K&N high flow air filter. It’s designed to increase horsepower and torque, improve throttle response, and enhance engine sound. The K&N short ram intake also includes a high flow air filter, but features a mandrel-bent aluminum tube with a black powder-coated finish. It’s designed to reduce restriction and improve airflow to the engine.
Short Ram Intake Shootout
In order to determine which intake is better, we turned to a dyno shootout. The AMS and K&N intakes were both installed on the same Lancer Evolution IX and put through a series of tests on the dyno. The goal was to measure horsepower and torque gains, as well as throttle response and overall engine performance.
Maximizing Your Evo IX’s Performance
Why bother upgrading your intake system in the first place? The short answer is that it can lead to increased performance. By allowing more air to flow to your engine, you can improve horsepower and torque numbers. Additionally, a new intake system can give your car a more aggressive sound and improve throttle response.
Dyno-tested Results: Which is Better?
After a series of tests on the dyno, the results were in. The AMS short ram intake provided an increase of 17 horsepower and 12 lb-ft of torque, while the K&N short ram intake provided an increase of 11 horsepower and 7 lb-ft of torque. Both intakes showed improvements in throttle response and overall engine performance, but the AMS intake provided slightly better numbers.
Comparing AMS and K&N SRIs
So which intake is better for your Lancer Evolution IX? It ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. If you’re looking for the best possible performance gains and are willing to pay a premium, the AMS short ram intake is the way to go. If you’re on a tighter budget but still want improved performance, the K&N short ram intake is a solid choice.
Upgrade Your Evo IX Intake System Today
No matter which intake you choose, upgrading your Lancer Evolution IX’s intake system is a great way to take your car’s performance to the next level. With improved horsepower and torque, enhanced throttle response, and a better engine sound, you’ll truly be able to experience the thrill of driving your Evo IX. So why wait? Upgrade your intake system today and experience the difference for yourself.
In conclusion, the AMS and K&N short ram intakes are both great options for improving the performance of your Lancer Evolution IX. While the AMS intake provided slightly better numbers in our dyno shootout, the K&N intake is still a solid choice for those on a tighter budget. No matter which intake you choose, you’ll be able to maximize your Evo IX’s performance and truly experience the thrill of driving a car that can handle anything you throw at it. So what are you waiting for? Upgrade your intake system today and start enjoying the ride!