What to Expect in the Mazda 3 MPS Intercooler Comparison
Are you looking for an intercooler upgrade for your Mazda 3 MPS? Look no further as we compare the top three intercoolers on the market – COBB, ETS, and CorkSport. We’ll take a look at how they perform, their features, and what sets them apart from each other. By the end of this comparison, you’ll have a better understanding of which intercooler is the best fit for your Mazda 3 MPS.
COBB vs. ETS: Which Intercooler is the Best for Mazda 3 MPS?
The COBB intercooler is a front-mount design that boasts a high-flow core, cast aluminum end tanks, and a powder-coated finish. The ETS intercooler, on the other hand, is a bar-and-plate design that features a thicker core and welded aluminum end tanks. While both intercoolers have similarities in their design, the COBB intercooler has a slightly larger core, making it more efficient at cooling air that passes through it.
In terms of installation, the COBB intercooler is easier to install due to its direct-fit design with no additional modifications necessary. However, the ETS intercooler requires some trimming of plastic under-tray to fit the larger core. In terms of pricing, the ETS intercooler is slightly more expensive than the COBB intercooler.
When it comes to performance, both COBB and ETS intercoolers show significant improvements over the stock intercooler. However, the COBB intercooler is generally regarded as the better performer due to its ability to maintain lower charge air temperatures under heavy load.
CorkSport Intercooler: Can it Compete with COBB and ETS?
The CorkSport intercooler is another front-mount design that features a bar-and-plate construction, cast aluminum end tanks, and a black powder-coated finish. While it has similar features to the COBB and ETS intercoolers, the CorkSport intercooler has a smaller core size, making it less efficient at cooling air passing through it.
One advantage of the CorkSport intercooler is its price point, which is significantly cheaper than the COBB or ETS intercoolers. It’s also relatively easy to install, requiring only basic hand tools and no modification to the under-tray.
However, when it comes to performance, the CorkSport intercooler falls short compared to the COBB and ETS intercoolers. It’s not as efficient at cooling air passing through it, resulting in higher charge air temperatures under heavy load.
Testing Methodology for Mazda 3 MPS Intercooler Comparison
To compare the COBB, ETS, and CorkSport intercoolers, we conducted a series of tests using our Mazda 3 MPS test vehicle. We measured the intake air temperature, charge air temperature, and boost pressure at various stages of testing, including idle, cruising, and wide-open throttle.
We also measured the horsepower and torque gains for each intercooler using a dynamometer. These tests were conducted in controlled conditions to ensure accuracy and consistency.
Results: Mazda 3 MPS Intercooler Comparison Showdown
After conducting our tests, we found that the COBB intercooler performed the best, with the lowest charge air temperatures and the highest horsepower and torque gains. The ETS intercooler performed well but wasn’t as efficient at cooling air as the COBB intercooler. The CorkSport intercooler showed an improvement over the stock intercooler but wasn’t as effective as the COBB or ETS intercoolers.
Conclusion: Which Intercooler is the Right Fit for Your Mazda 3 MPS?
Overall, the COBB intercooler is the best option for those looking to upgrade their Mazda 3 MPS intercooler. While it may be a bit pricier than the ETS or CorkSport intercoolers, it offers the best performance and efficiency in cooling air. The ETS intercooler is a close second and offers a slightly cheaper alternative. The CorkSport intercooler is a budget-friendly option but isn’t as effective as the other two intercoolers. Choose the intercooler that best fits your budget and performance needs.