If you own a Mazda Protege MP3, you probably know that installing a performance air intake system is one of the easiest and most cost-effective ways to increase engine horsepower and torque. Injen and K&N are two of the most popular brands on the market, but which one is better? In this article, we will compare the Injen and K&N short ram intake systems for the Mazda Protege MP3, looking at their performance, sound, installation, and price.
Mazda Protege MP3: Injen vs. K&N Comparison Overview
The Injen and K&N short ram intakes are both designed to increase airflow to the engine, improving performance and throttle response. The Injen intake features a custom-designed dual mandrel-bent aluminum tube, while the K&N intake uses a mandrel-bent aluminum tube with a conical air filter at the end. Both intakes are designed to fit perfectly on the Mazda Protege MP3 without the need for additional modifications.
Performance Test: Injen vs. K&N Short Ram Intake
In terms of performance, both the Injen and K&N short ram intakes provide noticeable gains in horsepower and torque. According to dyno tests, the Injen intake provides a peak gain of around 7 horsepower and 7 lb-ft of torque, while the K&N intake provides a peak gain of around 6 horsepower and 6 lb-ft of torque. However, the Injen intake provides better mid-range gains compared to the K&N intake.
Sound Test: Injen vs. K&N Short Ram Intake
One of the most noticeable differences between the Injen and K&N short ram intakes is their sound. The Injen intake provides a deeper and more aggressive exhaust tone compared to the K&N intake, which provides a more subtle and mellow tone. If you’re looking for a more aggressive sound, the Injen intake is the way to go.
Installation Guide: Injen vs. K&N Short Ram Intake
Both the Injen and K&N short ram intakes come with detailed installation instructions and all the necessary hardware to install the intakes onto the Mazda Protege MP3. However, the Injen intake requires slightly more installation time compared to the K&N intake, as it is a two-piece design that requires the assembly of the intake tube and air filter.
Price Comparison: Injen vs. K&N Short Ram Intake
In terms of price, the Injen and K&N short ram intakes are similarly priced, with the Injen intake being slightly more expensive than the K&N intake. However, the price difference is negligible and shouldn’t be the determining factor when choosing between the two intakes.
Conclusion: Which Intake is Better for Mazda Protege MP3?
After comparing the Injen and K&N short ram intakes for the Mazda Protege MP3, it’s clear that both intakes provide significant performance gains and improved throttle response. However, the Injen intake provides better mid-range performance and a more aggressive exhaust tone, making it the better choice for drivers who prioritize performance and sound. The K&N intake, on the other hand, is a great option for drivers who prefer a more subtle exhaust tone and slightly easier installation. Regardless of which intake you choose, you can’t go wrong with either option for your Mazda Protege MP3.